Missonal, Incarnational, and Stewardship are terms that are too easily
tossed about these days. In order for the people of God to bring about flourishing
in our communities we need real definitions and concrete manifestations, rather
than vague illusions of what they mean.
Urban Homeless Shelter |
I believe to be, or take part in something missional is to become part
of what we recognize God is already doing in the community (missio Dei). This requires examination
of the sociological, historical, and political conditions in which the Church—and
our ministry—must become the visible expression of God to the world. When these
realities are properly merged we see truly incarnational mission at work – through
which we become stewards of God’s grace, justice, and resources of the Kingdom.
An incarnational mission involves our “real and abiding presence” in
the community that bears fruit for both the local church and the urban
environment. One cannot become part of the organism of community unless he or
she becomes intimate with its “cultural rhythms, life, and geography” (2003a,
39); as Ronald Sider shares, “Holistic ministry is incarnational ministry . . .
it’s God fleshing out the truth of the Gospel.” It is not only helping others
in the community, but inspiring the church member and stretching themselves outside
their traditional sphere of influence (2002, 27). Are we bold enough to commit
to an incarnational model as sufficient to match the changes in culture and
polity we face in this new millennium?
When efforts are not incarnational, little of lasting note gets done –
this can lead to negative issues . . . and those seeing themselves in the
“crosshairs” of perceived do-gooders begin to see themselves as “targets”
rather than in community (2003b, 108). Becoming part of our community
through assimilating its culture and recognizing context takes time and effort, which is
necessary in order to build a missional bridge of any permanence.
Fresno Rescue Mission's new Save the Children Home |
This integration
will take visionary church leaders who are able to assess the needs of the
community, as well as considering the strengths within a congregation, and to
build individual team leaders who can lay the groundwork for a safe and
appropriate missional outreach (2006b, 32). I mention “safe” as there is danger
in not considering the full impact of an urban environment when developing programs.
This type of missional outreach can allow people to step beyond the
“soup-kitchener” experience and into a more personal and contextual missional
expression of their faith and lifestyle.
Such change can only come through a
concerted effort of our church leaders, ministries and community agencies in
creating a bias for action through educating congregants in missional stewardship
of all that they control – time, treasure, and talents.
Frost, Michael, and Alan Hirsch. 2003a. The Shaping of
Things to Come: Innovation and Mission for the 21st Century Church. Peabody:
Hendrickson.
Linthicum, Robert. 2003b. Transforming Power: Biblical
Strategies for Making a Difference in Your Community. Downers Grove: IVP.
Roxburgh, Alan J. and Fred Romanuk. 2006b. The
Missional Leader: Equipping Your Church to Reach a Changing World. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sider, Ronald J., Philip N. Olson, and Heidi Rolland
Unruh. 2002. Churches That Make a Difference: Reaching Your Community with Good
News and Good Works. Grand Rapids: Baker.
No comments:
Post a Comment